Experts & Policy Network
A serious circle of leadership, senior advisors, fellows, contributors, and policy professionals supporting Washington-facing public affairs work.
Morse Policy Forum brings together founding leadership and senior advisory voices to support research, congressional engagement, advocacy technology, and policy communication prepared for leaders, congressional offices, advisors, institutions, and decision-focused readers.
Policy work strengthened by serious judgment
Morse Policy Forum is building a disciplined policy network designed to support research, congressional awareness, public affairs analysis, and institutional dialogue. The network begins with founding leadership and senior advisors, and it is structured to grow responsibly through fellows, contributors, and specialized policy tracks.
Leadership and senior advisors
The Forum’s initial network is intentionally focused. It presents the founding leadership and senior advisors who support the platform’s institutional posture, policy direction, and Washington-facing credibility.
Morse Policy Forum Leadership
A focused leadership and senior advisory circle supporting Morse Policy Forum’s research, congressional engagement, advocacy technology, and Washington-facing policy work.
This section identifies the founding leadership and senior advisors of Morse Policy Forum, a Washington, D.C.-based policy platform built for high-level research, congressional engagement, and serious public affairs communication.
Ismail Baker
Provides institutional direction for Morse Policy Forum and guides its policy posture, strategic communication, advocacy technology vision, and Washington-facing engagement.
Dr. Azza Abdel Hak
Supports the Forum’s senior advisory circle with perspective connected to congressional affairs, institutional communication, and serious policy-facing engagement.
Dr. Ahmad Alsibai
Supports the Forum’s senior advisory circle with policy affairs perspective, issue judgment, and review-oriented guidance for serious public affairs work.
Dr. Ousama Moammar
Supports the Forum’s senior advisory circle with strategic affairs perspective, institutional judgment, and high-level policy engagement review.
A structure that can grow without losing discipline
The Forum distinguishes leadership, senior advisory roles, fellows, contributors, and advocacy technology functions so that public titles remain accurate, useful, and credible.
Founding Leadership
The leadership function sets institutional direction, protects the Forum’s policy posture, and guides public-facing strategy.
View LeadershipSenior Advisors
Senior advisors contribute judgment, perspective, and issue-specific guidance without weakening the Forum’s independent standards.
View AdvisorsFellows
Fellows may support research, policy development, and issue-focused analysis connected to the Forum’s priorities.
View FellowsContributors
Contributors may support analysis, commentary, field-informed content, research assistance, or public affairs materials.
View ContributorsAdvocacy Technology
This track supports congressional tools, representative lookup, legislative monitoring, committee awareness, and structured Hill-facing workflows.
Open Congress ToolsExpertise connected to the Forum’s policy focus
The network supports work across areas where U.S. decision-making, international affairs, governance, compliance, stabilization, and humanitarian concerns intersect.
Syria & Middle East
Regional policy context, governance questions, public affairs, and U.S. engagement with Middle East developments.
U.S. Foreign Policy
Analysis of American policy posture, congressional attention, and international engagement.
Sanctions & Compliance
Policy implications, compliance awareness, risk framing, and sanctions-related public affairs.
Security & Stabilization
Institutional stability, security conditions, reconstruction environments, and strategic policy considerations.
Humanitarian Policy
Humanitarian conditions, aid policy, institutional response, and public-interest policy communication.
Governance & Institutions
Governance structures, institutional capacity, public administration, and reform-oriented policy analysis.
Association with the Forum carries responsibility
Morse Policy Forum presents its expert network with care. Public titles, profile language, and participation should support serious policy work and reflect the Forum’s standards for clarity, proportionality, institutional discipline, and public trust.
Professional Judgment
Participation should reflect discretion, seriousness, and respect for policy audiences.
Editorial Responsibility
Public association with the Forum must be consistent with accuracy, clarity, and proportionality.
Institutional Discipline
Expert involvement should strengthen the Forum’s purpose, not create noise or weaken trust.
A serious network for serious policy work
Morse Policy Forum’s expert network is designed to grow carefully, bringing together leadership, advisors, fellows, contributors, and technical capacity that strengthen research, congressional engagement, and responsible policy communication.